Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891905›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2022

Effects of white noise on procedural pain-related cortical response and pain score in neonates: A randomized controlled trial.

Xuyan Ren, Li Li, Siya Lin, Chunxia Zhong, Bin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuyan RenClinical Nursing Education & Research Section, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Li LiClinical Nursing Education & Research Section, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Siya LinClinical Nursing Education & Research Section, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunxia ZhongDepartment of Pediatrics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of white noise on pain-related cortical response, pain score, and behavioral and physiological parameters in neonates with procedural pain. Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty-six neonates from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in a university-affiliated general hospital were randomly assigned to listen to white noise at 50 dB (experimental group) or 0 dB (control group) 2 min before radial artery blood sampling and continued until 5 min after needle withdrawal. Pain-related cortical response was measured by regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO Results: Sixty neonates (experimental group, Conclusion: The white noise intervention did not show beneficial effects on pain-related cortical response as well as pain score, behavioral and physiological parameters in neonates with procedural pain.

Indexed as

Facial expressionIntensive care unitsNeonatesPremature infant pain profile-revisedProcedural painRadial arteryRegional cerebral oxygen saturationWhite noise

Identifiers

PMID35891905
PMCPMC9305016
OpenAlexW4283018018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.