ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2022
The development and evaluation of a nurse anaesthesia model for practice in South Africa.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors behind high caesarean section in Bangladesh: insight from a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- The influencing factors and generation path of digital health literacy among adolescents: evidence from 18 provinces in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This article aimed to present a developed model for nurse anaesthesia practice in South Africa and then to evaluate the model by national and international anaesthetist experts. Methods: For the model development, a theory-generative research design was used as guided by Chinn & Kramer. The study included four steps to develop and evaluate the model: step one, concept analysis; step two, placing the concepts into relationships; step three, description and critical reflection of the model; step four, evaluation of the model. For evaluation of the model, data were collected using individual, in-depth interviews. Four South African medical specialist anaesthesiologists and four international nurse anaesthetists were interviewed. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using Tesch's eight steps of thematic data analysis. Results: The model was described in four phases: relationship phase, working phase, termination phase, and independent phase. The model shows a development process of a student nurse anaesthetist by a nurse anaesthetist facilitator to the mastery of the scope of practice of a nurse anaesthetist. Two themes (six categories) emerged through thematic analysis: the model and guidelines for implementation were found to be appropriate (model and guidelines for implementation are important because of the need for nurse anaesthetist, the model is applicable because it is described as comprehensive, the relationship phase was found to be important and the interdependence between disciplines is imperative, the affirmation that mastery has to be attained by nurse anaesthetists due to the complexity of services rendered), anticipated limitations to the South African nurse anaesthetist (the need to identify complex patients and limitations on the setting and refer to higher level of care, limitations due to red tape). Conclusions: This model provides fertile soil to inform and outline the education (curriculum) and practice (scope of practice) and research for nurse anaesthesia practice in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.