Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891885›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2022

Evaluation of a Virtual Networking Event for Emerging Women Leaders in Global Health.

Sloka Iyengar, Joanna Ehrlich, Eumihn Chung, Agustina M Marconi, Aliza R Karpes Matusevich, Aisha Ahmed Abubakar, Nukhba Zia, Anna Kalbarczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sloka IyengarAmerican Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, US.ORCID 0000-0003-4790-1466
Joanna EhrlichTexas Department of State Health Services, Houston, Texas, US.ORCID 0000-0001-7828-7222
Eumihn ChungJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-5469
Agustina M MarconiUniversity of Madison-Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, US.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-3030
Aliza R Karpes MatusevichSchool of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, US.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-6918
Aisha Ahmed AbubakarAhmadu Bello University Zaria, NG.ORCID 0000-0002-0112-9717
Nukhba ZiaJohns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, US.ORCID 0000-0002-2521-6049
Anna KalbarczykJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.ORCID 0000-0002-6143-8634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Networks are critical for leadership development, but not all networks and networking activities are created equally. Women and people of color face unique challenges accessing networks, many of which were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual platforms offer opportunities for global professionals to connect and can be better tailored to meet the needs of different groups. As part of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health annual meeting in 2021, we organized a networking session to provide a networking space for emerging women leaders in global health (i.e. trainees, early career professionals, and/or those transitioning to the field). Objectives: We evaluated the virtual networking session to better understand participants' perception of the event and its utility for professional growth and development. Methods: We distributed online surveys to participants immediately after the event and conducted a 3-month follow-up. Out of 225 participant, 24 responded to both surveys and their data was included in the analysis. We conducted descriptive quantitative analysis for multiple choice and Likert scale items; qualitative data was analyzed for themes. Findings: Participants represented 8 countries and a range of organizations. Participants appreciated the structure of the networking session; all participants agreed that they met someone from a different country and most indicated they had plans to collaborate with a new connection. When asked if the event strengthened their network and if they will keep in touch with new people, most participants strongly agreed or agreed in both surveys. However, after the follow-up, participants noted challenges in sustaining connections including lack of follow-up and misaligned expectations of networks. Conclusions: The virtual networking event brought together women in global health from diverse backgrounds. This study found that while networking events can be impactful in enhancing professional networks, ensuring sustained connections remains a challenge. This study also suggests that measures to increase the depth and meaningfulness of these connections in a virtual setting and enabling post-event collaboration can help networks become more inclusive and sustainable.

Indexed as

COVID-19Global HealthFemaleHumansLeadershipPandemicsSurveys and Questionnairesglobal healthNetworkvirtual eventwomen’s leadership

Identifiers

PMID35891885
PMCPMC9284988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.