ArticleCureus2022
Role of Steroids in Sickle Cell Patients With Acute Chest Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for the management of emergencies and critical illness in pediatric and adult patients with sickle cell disease.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The role of corticosteroids to treat acute chest syndrome (ACS) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) has always been a matter of debate. In clinical practice, systemic steroids were given for ACS with more severe disease. With the lack of standard treatment guidelines, their use to treat ACS is highly physician-dependent and varies widely across different hospitals. The utility of corticosteroids in ACS remains unclear. The objective of our study was to describe the differences between SCD patients treated with corticosteroids for ACS and those who were not and to evaluate the association between corticosteroid use, length of stay, and readmission rates. Methodology We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with SCD ≤18 years of age hospitalized for ACS at Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center between January 2016 and May 2021. Results We identified 43 patients with 60 episodes of ACS (median age was 11 years and 55% were males). In total, 32 such episodes were treated with corticosteroids. The use of bronchodilators (p = 0.23), hydroxyurea (p = 0.13), and the presence of fever (p = 0.86) showed no significant difference between the two groups. The need for blood transfusions (p = 0.005), intensive care unit admission (p = 0.031), respiratory support (p = 0.011), and chest X-ray finding with more than one lobe involvement (p = 0.003) all point to moderate or severe ACS, which has been linked to steroid use. The length of hospital stay (p = 0.07) and the readmission rate (p = 0.31) were not statistically significant between the groups. Even in the subgroup with asthma, the length of stay was not different between the groups (p = 0.44). Conclusions Our results show that treatment with systemic steroids for ACS is associated with more severe disease. The length of hospital stay was not different between the steroid-treated and untreated groups. Corticosteroids were not associated with a higher readmission rate in our study population, even in ACS patients with comorbid asthma. Further adequately powered prospective trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of corticosteroids in ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.