ArticleInternational journal of educational technology in higher education2022
The university students' self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education.
Article in International journal of educational technology in higher education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Digital Eye Strain Symptoms Among Sudanese Medical Students During Conflict-Induced Online Learning: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The role of the 2023 earthquakes in the competencies and critical thinking skills of teacher candidates in Türkiye.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Designing a virtual learning framework in medical education: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Examining the Effects of Different Types of Achievement Goal Orientation on Undergraduate Students' Engagement in Distance Learning: The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Stress-related experiences and intentions to quit studies among female married postgraduate distance education students in Ghana.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Online Food-Safety Educational Programs: A Systematic Review, Random-Effects Meta-Analysis, and Thematic Synthesis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Surviving the shift: College student satisfaction with emergency online learning during COVID-19 pandemic.World journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Article
- The relationships among Taiwanese youth's polychronicity, multitasking behavior and perceived learning performance in online learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Attending lectures in person, hybrid or online-how do students choose, and what about the outcome?International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2023Article
- Student-centered case-based teaching and online-offline case discussion in postgraduate courses of computer science.International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distance education offers flexible learning opportunities in terms of time, place and learning speed to teachers and students through internet technologies. However, the learning opportunities provided in distance education environments require students to act more autonomously and take more responsibility for regulating their learning processes to achieve their learning goals. For this reason, it is crucial to reveal the relationships between flexibility, self-regulated effort and satisfaction factors to provide efficient and effective learning environments in distance education. Accordingly, within the scope of this study, it is aimed to investigate university students' perceptions of flexibility, self-regulated effort and satisfaction with the distance education process, and their views on distance education. Survey research was used as the research method in the study. The study sample consisted of 1760 university students studying at 28 different universities. Data were analysed using t-test, ANOVA, and regression methods. As a result of the study, male students were more satisfied with distance education than female students, and education faculty students had the highest level of satisfaction. In addition, self-regulated effort and flexibility variables were significant factors affecting students' satisfaction towards distance education. Furthermore, the advantages and problems of distance education and suggestions for future distance learning environments were presented in the light of students views. Finally, the study's implications and various recommendations for practitioners and researchers were discussed in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.