Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891647›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

A spatiotemporal ensemble machine learning framework for generating land use/land cover time-series maps for Europe (2000-2019) based on LUCAS, CORINE and GLAD Landsat.

Martijn Witjes, Leandro Parente, Chris J van Diemen, Tomislav Hengl, Martin Landa, Lukáš Brodský, Lena Halounova, Josip Križan, Luka Antonić, Codrina Maria Ilie and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Martijn WitjesOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Leandro ParenteOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Chris J van DiemenOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Tomislav HenglOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Martin LandaDepartment of Geomatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lukáš BrodskýDepartment of Geomatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lena HalounovaDepartment of Geomatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Josip KrižanMultiOne, Zagreb, Croatia.
Luka AntonićMultiOne, Zagreb, Croatia.
Codrina Maria IlieTerrasigna, Bucharest, Romania.
Vasile CraciunescuTerrasigna, Bucharest, Romania.
Milan KilibardaDepartment of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ognjen AntonijevićDepartment of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Luka GlušicaGILAB, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A spatiotemporal machine learning framework for automated prediction and analysis of long-term Land Use/Land Cover dynamics is presented. The framework includes: (1) harmonization and preprocessing of spatial and spatiotemporal input datasets (GLAD Landsat, NPP/VIIRS) including five million harmonized LUCAS and CORINE Land Cover-derived training samples, (2) model building based on spatial k-fold cross-validation and hyper-parameter optimization, (3) prediction of the most probable class, class probabilities and model variance of predicted probabilities per pixel, (4) LULC change analysis on time-series of produced maps. The spatiotemporal ensemble model consists of a random forest, gradient boosted tree classifier, and an artificial neural network, with a logistic regressor as meta-learner. The results show that the most important variables for mapping LULC in Europe are: seasonal aggregates of Landsat green and near-infrared bands, multiple Landsat-derived spectral indices, long-term surface water probability, and elevation. Spatial cross-validation of the model indicates consistent performance across multiple years with overall accuracy (a weighted F1-score) of 0.49, 0.63, and 0.83 when predicting 43 (level-3), 14 (level-2), and five classes (level-1). Additional experiments show that spatiotemporal models generalize better to unknown years, outperforming single-year models on known-year classification by 2.7% and unknown-year classification by 3.5%. Results of the accuracy assessment using 48,365 independent test samples shows 87% match with the validation points. Results of time-series analysis (time-series of LULC probabilities and NDVI images) suggest forest loss in large parts of Sweden, the Alps, and Scotland. Positive and negative trends in NDVI in general match the land degradation and land restoration classes, with "urbanization" showing the most negative NDVI trend. An advantage of using spatiotemporal ML is that the fitted model can be used to predict LULC in years that were not included in its training dataset, allowing generalization to past and future periods,

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringUrbanizationEuropeProbabilityTime FactorsBig dataEnsembleEnvironmental monitoringLandsatLand use/land coverMachine learningProbabilitySpatial analysisSpatiotemporalUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35891647
PMCPMC9308969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.