Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891641›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biochemistry and molecular biology2022

An improved method for isolation of RNA from rat femur.

Alka Khera, Thungapathra MuthuKumarappa, Dheeraj Dumir, Poonam Kanta, Gaurav Kumar, Jaswinder Kalra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biochemistry and molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alka KheraDepartment of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Thungapathra MuthuKumarappaDepartment of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Dheeraj DumirDepartment of Cardiology, Max Super Specialty Hospital Mohali, Punjab, India.
Poonam KantaDepartment of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Gaurav KumarAdvanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Jaswinder KalraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA isolation from ossified bone is a difficult and time-consuming process which often results in poor recovery of RNA. The yield is limited and might not be suitable for gene quantification studies by real time PCR. METHODOLOGY: The present study demonstrates RNA extraction from rat femur utilizing the silica column along with the trizol reagent. Quality of RNA was assessed by agarose gel analysis and its suitability for real-time PCR analysis was determined by β-actin Ct values.

resultsThe RNA isolated using silica columns in conjugation with trizol reagent resulted in higher yield of RNA and purity (A260/280=2.04; yield =1545.73 µg/ml) compared to the trizol method alone (A260/280=1.85; yield =571.2 µg/ml). Ct value of β actin obtained from RNA isolated by trizol method was higher than the Ct value obtained by trizol in conjugation with the column method (31.41 and 15.41 respectively).

conclusionCombination of trizol along with silica column resulted in better quality and improved yield of RNA suitable for gene quantification by Real time PCR.

Indexed as

FemurratRNAtrizol

Identifiers

PMID35891641
PMCPMC9301144
OpenAlexW4288220028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.