Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891638›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports2022

Neural Mechanisms of Motor Dysfunction in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Vincent Koppelmans, Benjamin Silvester, Kevin Duff

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent KoppelmansDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah, SaltLake City, UT, USA.
Benjamin SilvesterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah, SaltLake City, UT, USA.
Kevin DuffDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah, SaltLake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Motor Profiles as Novel Biomarker for Alzheimer’s DiseaseK01AG073578 · NIA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KOPPELMANS, VINCENT · 2021 to 2025
$651k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG073578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the prevalence of motor symptoms in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), their underlying neural mechanisms have not been thoroughly studied. Objective: This review summarizes the neural underpinnings of motor deficits in MCI and AD. Methods: We searched PubMed up until August of 2021 and identified 37 articles on neuroimaging of motor function in MCI and AD. Study bias was evaluated based on sample size, availability of control samples, and definition of the study population in terms of diagnosis. Results: The majority of studies investigated gait, showing that slower gait was associated with smaller hippocampal volume and prefrontal deactivation. Less prefrontal activation was also observed during cognitive-motor dual tasking, while more activation in cerebellar, cingulate, cuneal, somatosensory, and fusiform brain regions was observed when performing a hand squeezing task. Excessive subcortical white matter lesions in AD were associated with more signs of parkinsonism, poorer performance during a cognitive and motor dual task, and poorer functional mobility. Gait and cognitive dual-tasking was furthermore associated with cortical thickness of temporal lobe regions. Most non-gait motor measures were only reported in one study in relation to neural measures. Conclusion: Cross-sectional designs, lack of control groups, mixing amnestic- and non-amnestic MCI, disregard of sex differences, and small sample sizes limited the interpretation of several studies, which needs to be addressed in future research to progress the field.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasediffusion tensor imagingfunctional MRIfunctional near-infrared spectroscopymagnetic resonance imagingmild cognitive impairmentmotor function

Identifiers

PMID35891638
PMCPMC9277676
OpenAlexW4281835317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.