Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891520›Full record

Observational studyViruses2022

Real-World Safety, Effectiveness, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection Treated with Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir: Updated Data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R).

Markus Cornberg, Albrecht Stoehr, Uwe Naumann, Gerlinde Teuber, Hartwig Klinker, Thomas Lutz, Hjördis Möller, Dennis Hidde, Kristina Lohmann, Karl-Georg Simon

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Potential Impact of Frequent Testing for Hepatitis C Virus Among People Who Inject Drugs Toward Hepatitis C Elimination in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Markus CornbergKlinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Hannover Medizinische Hochschule, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Albrecht StoehrIFI Medizin GmbH, 20099 Hamburg, Germany.
Uwe NaumannUBN-Praxis, 14059 Berlin, Germany.
Gerlinde TeuberPractice PD Dr. med. G. Teuber, 60594 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Hartwig KlinkerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Thomas LutzInfektiologikum, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Hjördis MöllerLeberzentrum am Checkpoint, 10961 Berlin, Germany.
Dennis HiddeAbbVie Germany GmbH & Co., KG, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4469-2323
Kristina LohmannAbbVie Germany GmbH & Co., KG, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany.
Karl-Georg SimonMVZ Dres Eisenbach/Simon/ Schwarz/GbR, 51375 Leverkusen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6668-2989
AbbVie (Germany) · DEInstitute for Interdisciplinary Medicine · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsche Hepatitis C-Register, DHC-R), we report the real-world safety and effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) treatment and its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in underserved populations who are not typically included in clinical trials, yet who will be crucial for achieving hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. The DHC-R is an ongoing, non-interventional, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study on patients treated for chronic HCV infection in Germany. The data cutoff was 17 January 2021. The primary effectiveness endpoint was sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients receiving GLE/PIB. PROs were assessed using the SF-36 survey. Of 2354 patients, 1964 had valid SVR12 data (intention-to-treat analysis). Of these, 1905 (97.0%) achieved SVR12 with rates similar across the comorbidities analyzed, except for people who actively use drugs (PWUD (active)) (86.4%). Excluding those who discontinued treatment and did not achieve SVR12, or were reinfected with HCV, the rate was 99.3%, with similar results regardless of comorbidity. PWUD (active) and those with psychiatric disorders had the most meaningful improvements in PROs. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 631/2354 patients (26.8%), and serious AEs in 44 patients (1.9%). GLE/PIB was highly effective and well tolerated in this real-world study of patient groups key to HCV elimination.

Indexed as

Hepatitis C, ChronicAminoisobutyric AcidsAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesCyclopropanesGenotypeHepacivirusHumansLactams, MacrocyclicLeucinePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProlineProspective StudiesPyrrolidinesQuinoxalinesRegistriesAminoisobutyric AcidsAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesCyclopropanesglecaprevirLactams, MacrocyclicLeucinepibrentasvirProlinePyrrolidinesQuinoxalinesSulfonamidesdirect-acting antiviralGerman Hepatitis C-Registryglecaprevir/pibrentasvirhepatitis C virusreal world evidence

Identifiers

PMID35891520
PMCPMC9318383
OpenAlexW4285597217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.