Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891476›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Cross-Serotype Reactivity of ELISAs Used to Detect Antibodies to the Structural Proteins of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus.

Anna B Ludi, Alison Morris, Simon Gubbins, Amin Asfor, Madeeha Afzal, Clare F Browning, Santina Grazioli, Efrem Alessandro Foglia, Ginette Wilsden, Alison Burman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna B LudiThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.
Alison MorrisThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.
Simon GubbinsThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0538-4173
Amin AsforThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.
Madeeha AfzalThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8954-8934
Clare F BrowningThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.
Santina GrazioliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), Via Bianchi 9, 24125 Brescia, Italy.
Efrem Alessandro FogliaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), Via Bianchi 9, 24125 Brescia, Italy.
Ginette WilsdenThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.
Alison BurmanThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.
Emiliana BrocchiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), Via Bianchi 9, 24125 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1864-080X
David J PatonThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.
Donald P KingThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 ONF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6959-2708
The Pirbright Institute · GBIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · IT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007035, BBS/E/I/00007036, and BBS/E/I/00007037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies to the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) capsid induced by infection or vaccination can provide serotype-specific protection and be measured using virus neutralization tests and viral structural-protein (SP-)ELISAs. Separate tests are needed for each serotype, but cross-serotype reactions complicate serotyping. In this study, inter-serotypic responses were quantified for five SP-ELISA formats by testing 294 monovalent mainly bovine sera collected following infection, vaccination, or vaccination and infection with one of five serotypes of FMDV. Over half of the samples, representing all three immunization categories, scored positive for at least one heterologous serotype and some scored positive for all serotypes tested. A comparative approach to identifying the strongest reaction amongst serotypes O, A and Asia 1 improved the accuracy of serotyping to 73-100% depending on the serotype and test system, but this method will be undermined where animals have been infected and/or vaccinated with multiple FMDV serotypes. Preliminary studies with stabilized recombinant capsid antigens of serotypes O and A that do not expose internal epitopes showed reduced cross-reactivity, supporting the hypothesis that capsid integrity can affect the serotype-specificity of the SP-ELISAs. The residual cross-reactivity associated with capsid surface epitopes was consistent with the evidence of cross-serotype virus neutralization.

Indexed as

Foot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCapsid ProteinsCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpitopesSerogroupAntibodies, ViralCapsid ProteinsEpitopesantibodycross-reactivityfoot-and-mouth disease virusserologySP-ELISA

Identifiers

PMID35891476
PMCPMC9316314
OpenAlexW4285012611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.