Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891394›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Weekly Nowcasting of New COVID-19 Cases Using Past Viral Load Measurements.

Athar Khalil, Khalil Al Handawi, Zeina Mohsen, Afif Abdel Nour, Rita Feghali, Ibrahim Chamseddine, Michael Kokkolaras

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Athar KhalilDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4072-6143
Khalil Al HandawiGroup for Research in Decision Analysis (GERAD), Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-2396
Zeina MohsenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut 2010, Lebanon.
Afif Abdel NourSchool of Engineering, The Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh 446, Lebanon.
Rita FeghaliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut 2010, Lebanon.
Ibrahim ChamseddineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7005-8692
Michael KokkolarasGroup for Research in Decision Analysis (GERAD), Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-3393
Rafik Hariri University Hospital · LBGroup for Research in Decision Analysis · CAHarvard University · USHoly Spirit University of Kaslik · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid spread of the coronavirus disease COVID-19 has imposed clinical and financial burdens on hospitals and governments attempting to provide patients with medical care and implement disease-controlling policies. The transmissibility of the disease was shown to be correlated with the patient's viral load, which can be measured during testing using the cycle threshold (Ct). Previous models have utilized Ct to forecast the trajectory of the spread, which can provide valuable information to better allocate resources and change policies. However, these models combined other variables specific to medical institutions or came in the form of compartmental models that rely on epidemiological assumptions, all of which could impose prediction uncertainties. In this study, we overcome these limitations using data-driven modeling that utilizes Ct and previous number of cases, two institution-independent variables. We collected three groups of patients (n = 6296, n = 3228, and n = 12,096) from different time periods to train, validate, and independently validate the models. We used three machine learning algorithms and three deep learning algorithms that can model the temporal dynamic behavior of the number of cases. The endpoint was 7-week forward number of cases, and the prediction was evaluated using mean square error (MSE). The sequence-to-sequence model showed the best prediction during validation (MSE = 0.025), while polynomial regression (OLS) and support vector machine regression (SVR) had better performance during independent validation (MSE = 0.1596, and MSE = 0.16754, respectively), which exhibited better generalizability of the latter. The OLS and SVR models were used on a dataset from an external institution and showed promise in predicting COVID-19 incidences across institutions. These models may support clinical and logistic decision-making after prospective validation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Epidemiological ModelsAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineViral LoadCOVID-19Ct valuesdeep neural networksmachine learningnow-castingpredictive modelingstatistical analysisviral load

Identifiers

PMID35891394
PMCPMC9317659
OpenAlexW4288205420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.