Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891322›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Behind the Scenes of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Psychological Predictors in an Italian Community Sample.

Sofia Tagini, Agostino Brugnera, Roberta Ferrucci, Alberto Priori, Angelo Compare, Laura Parolin, Gabriella Pravettoni, Vincenzo Silani, Barbara Poletti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distrustful, Dissatisfied, and Conspiratorial: A Latent Profile Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Rejection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sofia TaginiDepartment of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, 20149 Milan, Italy.
Agostino BrugneraDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, 24129 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-4552
Roberta FerrucciAldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, International Medical School, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5109-9483
Alberto PrioriAldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, International Medical School, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1549-3851
Angelo CompareDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, 24129 Bergamo, Italy.
Laura ParolinDepartment of Psychology, University Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo SilaniDepartment of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, 20149 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7698-3854
Barbara PolettiDepartment of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, 20149 Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITUniversity of Bergamo · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological variables may be crucial in favoring or discouraging health-related behaviors, including vaccine acceptance. This study aimed to extend the previous literature by outlining the psychological profile associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a sample of Italian citizens. Between April and May 2021, 1122 Italian volunteers completed a web survey on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, also including several self-reported psychological measures. A multiple hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the psychological variables associated with vaccine hesitancy. Low confidence in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety, low collective responsibility, high complacency, and high calculation (i.e., extensive information searching, and costs-benefit estimates) predicted higher hesitancy. Our results suggest that to be effective, vaccine-related communications should be as clear, understandable, and sound as possible, preventing the spreading of misunderstandings, or even fake information, that may foster people's insecurities and distrust. Furthermore, the advantages and necessity of vaccination, both at the individual and community-level, should be clearly emphasized. Efficacious vaccine-related communications may be crucial, not only to maintain an adequate immunity rate for COVID-19, but also to inform policymakers and public authorities in the case of possible future infectious outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19psychological antecedentspsychological predictorsvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35891322
PMCPMC9325138
OpenAlexW4286718858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.