Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891250›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Knowledge of University Students in Health Care Settings on Vaccines and Vaccinations Strategies: Impact Evaluation of a Specific Educational Training Course during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period in Italy.

Sara Boccalini, Alfredo Vannacci, Giada Crescioli, Niccolò Lombardi, Marco Del Riccio, Giuseppe Albora, Jonida Shtylla, Marco Masoni, Maria Renza Guelfi, Paolo Bonanni and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara BoccaliniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9695-7549
Alfredo VannacciDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5259-2026
Giada CrescioliDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1071-6120
Niccolò LombardiDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-0438
Marco Del RiccioMedical School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2742-0297
Giuseppe AlboraMedical School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Jonida ShtyllaSIAF-E-Learning Process Unit and IT Training, Area for the Innovation and Management of Information and Computer Systems, University of Florence, 50141 Florence, Italy.
Marco MasoniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-8689
Maria Renza GuelfiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Paolo BonanniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2875-3744
Angela BechiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6013-8779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Training future healthcare professionals on vaccination through specific courses is important to properly promote active immunization among the general population and to fight fake news and false beliefs on vaccinations. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of an elective course about vaccinations on the knowledge of medical students, pharmacy students, and medical resident in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine in Italy. Methods: The participants were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire before and after an elective teaching activity (ETA) on vaccination. The two questionnaires contained the same 30 questions and focused on different aspects of vaccines and vaccination. The students who had attended the seminar were allowed to fulfil the post-lecture questionnaire. Both descriptive and inferential analysis were performed on the results; in particular, Student’s t-test for independent samples was used to compare the total score obtained before and after attending the ETA. Results: A total of 449 students participated in the ETA. Overall, the participation in the ETA allowed them to significantly improve their final score (+27.28%, p < 0.001). Good results were obtained even when comparing the three groups (medical students, pharmacy students and medical residents) separately. Females improved more than males, especially among pharmacy students. Discussion: The present study highlights the importance and the impact that extracurricular activities can have in improving knowledge about vaccinations. With vaccination and vaccine hesitancy and acceptance topics with increasing attention paid by the population, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, it is fundamental to develop new strategies to increase future healthcare professionals’ knowledge about vaccinations.

Indexed as

elective training activitieshealth care workersimmunizationimpact assessmentmedical education

Identifiers

PMID35891250
PMCPMC9316295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.