Public Vaccination Reluctance: What Makes Us Change Our Minds? Results of A Longitudinal Cohort Survey.

Paweł Waszkiewicz, Piotr Lewulis, Michał Górski, Adam Czarnecki, Wojciech Feleszko

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

Understanding the rationales and information environments for early, late, and nonadopters of the COVID-19 vaccine.NPJ vaccines · 2024
Article
Adolescents' Opinions on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Hints toward Enhancing Pandemic Preparedness in the Future.Vaccines · 2023
Article
First Year of Special Issue "New Insights in Vaccination and Public Health": Opinions and Considerations.Vaccines · 2023
Article
Strengthened belief in vaccine effectiveness predicted increased COVID-19 vaccination intention and behaviour: Results from a nationally representative longitudinal survey of U.S. adults from July 2020 to April/May 2021.Vaccine · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paweł WaszkiewiczDepartment of Criminalistics, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9608-1586

Piotr LewulisDepartment of Criminalistics, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8303-0971

Michał GórskiDepartment of Criminalistics, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.

Adam CzarneckiARC Rynek i Opinia, Market Research Institute, Słowackiego 12, 01-627 Warsaw, Poland.

Wojciech FeleszkoDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 63A, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-2012

Funding

Medical University of Warsaw 1W34/NUW1/20:MATUniversity of Warsaw 1W34/NUW1/20:MAT

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper presents a longitudinal cohort survey on the public acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination and real vaccination levels. A survey on a representative sample of adult Polish citizens (

Indexed as

COVID-19vaccine hesitancyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID35891244

DOI10.3390/vaccines10071081

PMCPMC9321479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.