Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891212›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Assessing COVID-19 Booster Hesitancy and Its Correlates: An Early Evidence from India.

Geetanjali C Achrekar, Kavita Batra, Yashashri Urankar, Ravi Batra, Naved Iqbal, Sabiha A Choudhury, Deepti Hooda, Roohi Khan, Suraj Arora, Aditi Singh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Vaccine Literacy and Vaccination: A Systematic Review.International journal of public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Using the Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Understand COVID-19 Booster Hesitancy in Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Geetanjali C AchrekarDepartment of Economics, GVMs College of Commerce and Economics, Ponda Goa 403401, India.
Kavita BatraDepartment of Medical Education, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0722-0191
Yashashri UrankarCommunity Health Centers of South-Central Texas, Gonzales, TX 78629, USA.
Ravi BatraDepartment of Information Technology, Coforge Ltd., Atlanta, GA 30338, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-3582
Naved IqbalDepartment of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-8938
Sabiha A ChoudhuryDepartment of Psychology, Mizoram University, Tanhril, Aizaw l796004, India.
Deepti HoodaDepartment of Psychology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak 124001, Haryana, India.
Roohi KhanAcademics Department, London School of Commerce, Chaucer House, White Hart Yard, London SE1 1NX, UK.
Suraj AroraDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia.
Aditi SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7247-2213
Francesco ChiricoPost-graduate School of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-4368
Manoj SharmaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-2414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 mutants, waning immunity, and breakthrough infections prompted the use of booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine to fight against the pandemic. India started booster doses in January 2022 and it is critical to determine the intention of booster dose uptake and its correlates. Therefore, the current cross-sectional study aimed to investigate booster dose acceptability and associated predictors among the Indian population. A convenience sampling technique was utilized to recruit a sample of 687 Indian residents. A 55-item psychometric validated survey tool was used to assess booster dose acceptability, vaccine literacy and vaccine confidence. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistical methods were used to analyze the data. Over 50% of participants reported their willingness to take the booster dose. Among the group not willing to take the booster dose (n = 303, 44.1%), a significantly larger proportion of respondents were unvaccinated with the primary series (12.2% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001), had an annual income below 2.96 lacs/annum (52.8% vs. 33.1, p < 0.001), were residents of rural areas (38.0% vs. 23.2%, p < 0.001), were not living with vulnerable individuals (78.5% vs. 65.2%, p < 0.001) and did not have family/friends who had tested positive for COVID-19 (54.6% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.001). Demographic, vaccine variables and multi-theory model subscales to predict the initiation of booster dose among hesitant participants were statistically significant, R2 = 0.561, F (26, 244) = 11.978, p < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 0.514. Findings of this study highlight the need to develop evidence-based interventions to promote vaccine uptake, particularly among hard-to-reach communities living in developing countries.

Indexed as

communicative literacyCOVID-19critical literacyfunctional literacyherd immunitySARS-CoV-2vaccine boostervaccine confidence indexvaccine hesitancyvaccine literacy

Identifiers

PMID35891212
PMCPMC9323084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.