Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35891194›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Cellular Immune Response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Large Cohort of Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Care University Hospital.

Cristina Costa, Gitana Scozzari, Enrica Migliore, Claudia Galassi, Giovannino Ciccone, Guido Ricciardelli, Antonio Scarmozzino, Lorenzo Angelone, Paola Cassoni, Rossana Cavallo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina CostaMicrobiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Gitana ScozzariMolinette Hospital Medical Direction, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5108-3876
Enrica MiglioreClinical Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Claudia GalassiClinical Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Giovannino CicconeClinical Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Guido RicciardelliMicrobiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Antonio ScarmozzinoMolinette Hospital Medical Direction, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo AngeloneMolinette Hospital Medical Direction, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Paola CassoniPathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1977-7410
Rossana CavalloMicrobiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
On Behalf Of The Collaborative Group
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Banca del Piemonte 73301 Prof. Rossana Cavallo
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the results of a T-cell immunity evaluation performed after a median elapsed time of 7 months from second-dose BNT162b2 vaccine administration, in a representative sample of 419 subjects from a large cohort of hospital workers. Overall, the Quantiferon SARS-CoV-2 assay detected a responsive pattern in 49.9%, 59.2% and 68.3% of subjects to three different antigenic stimuli from SARS-CoV-2, respectively, with 72.3% of positivity to at least one antigenic stimulus. Potential predictors of cellular response were explored by multivariable analyses; factors associated with positivity to cellular response (to Ag1 antigenic stimulus) were a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 4.24, 95% CI 2.34−7.67, p < 0.001), increasing age (per year: OR = 1.03 95% CI 1.01−1.06, p = 0.019 and currently smoking (compared to never smoking) (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.11−3.36, p = 0.010). Increasing time interval between vaccine administration and T-cell test was associated with decreasing cellular response (per week of time: OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91−0.98, p = 0.003). A blood group A/AB/B (compared to group O) was associated with higher levels of cellular immunity, especially when measured as Ag2 antigenic stimulus. Levels of cellular immunity tended to be lower among subjects that self-reported an autoimmune disorder or an immunodeficiency and among males. Further studies to assess the protective significance of different serological and cellular responses to the vaccine toward the risk of reinfection and the severity of COVID-19 are needed to better understand these findings.

Indexed as

cellularhealth care workersimmunitymRNA vaccinationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35891194
PMCPMC9316283
OpenAlexW4283654182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.