ArticleVaccines2022
Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Mapping of Anthrax Vaccine Publications from 1991 through 2021.
Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of Cow's Milk Protein Allergy Research in the Past Two Decades.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Article
- Research on traumatic orthopedic surgery robots: a decade bibliometric analysis of research landscapes and evolving frontiers.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Research trends of global artificial intelligence application in obstetrics and gynecology from 1999 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis based on web of science.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Bibliometrics analysis and knowledge mapping of pertussis vaccine research: trends from 1994 to 2023.Infection · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the application of artificial intelligence in orthopedic imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Impact of mitochondrial damage on tumor microenvironment and immune response: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Knowledge Mapping of Aspergillus-Related Research in Respiratory Medicine: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on English-Language Articles Spanning 1975 to 2022.Canadian respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Global research trends in MERS-CoV: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis from 2012 to 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to analyze and characterize anthrax vaccine-related research, key developments, global research trends, and mapping of published scientific research articles during the last three decades (1991-2021).
methodsA bibliometric and visualized study was conducted. The Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) was searched using relevant keywords ("Anthrax" OR "Anthrax bacterium" OR "
resultsThe initial search yielded 1750 documents. After screening the titles and abstracts of the published studies, a total of 1090 articles published from 1991 to 2021 were included in the final analysis. These articles were published in 334 journals and were authored by 4567 authors from 64 countries with a collaboration index of 4.32. The annual scientific production growth rate was found to be 9.68%. The analyzed articles were cited 31335 times. The most productive year was 2006 (
conclusionThis is the first bibliometric study that provides a comprehensive historical overview of scientific studies. From 2006 to 2008, more than 20% of the total articles were published; however, a decrease was observed since 2013 in anthrax vaccine research. The developed countries made significant contributions to anthrax vaccine-related research, especially the USA. Among the top 10 leading authors, six authors are from the USA. The majority of the top leading institutions are also from the USA. About 90% of the total studies were funded by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.