ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Impact of Data Augmentations on Deep Learning-Based Marine Object Classification in Benthic Image Transects.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep blueprint: A literature review and guide to automated image classification for ecologists.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Review
- Automated underwater image analysis reveals sediment patterns and megafauna distribution in the tropical Atlantic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Scaling down annotation needs: The capacity of self-supervised learning on diatom classification.iScience · 2025Article
- New interactive machine learning tool for marine image analysis.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data augmentation is an established technique in computer vision to foster the generalization of training and to deal with low data volume. Most data augmentation and computer vision research are focused on everyday images such as traffic data. The application of computer vision techniques in domains like marine sciences has shown to be not that straightforward in the past due to special characteristics, such as very low data volume and class imbalance, because of costly manual annotation by human domain experts, and general low species abundances. However, the data volume acquired today with moving platforms to collect large image collections from remote marine habitats, like the deep benthos, for marine biodiversity assessment and monitoring makes the use of computer vision automatic detection and classification inevitable. In this work, we investigate the effect of data augmentation in the context of taxonomic classification in underwater, i.e., benthic images. First, we show that established data augmentation methods (i.e., geometric and photometric transformations) perform differently in marine image collections compared to established image collections like the Cityscapes dataset, showing everyday traffic images. Some of the methods even decrease the learning performance when applied to marine image collections. Second, we propose new data augmentation combination policies motivated by our observations and compare their effect to those proposed by the AutoAugment algorithm and can show that the proposed augmentation policy outperforms the AutoAugment results for marine image collections. We conclude that in the case of small marine image datasets, background knowledge, and heuristics should sometimes be applied to design an effective data augmentation method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.