ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Accurate Signal Conditioning for Pulsed-Current Synchronous Measurements.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Optimized SVR Algorithm for Pulse Pile-Up Correction in Pulse Shape Discrimination.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- High-Performance Self-Powered Dual-Mode Ultraviolet Photodetector Based on (PEA)Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Sub-Picoampere Measurement Algorithm for Use in Dosimetry of Time-Varying Radiation Fields.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A readout system for highly sensitive diamond detectors for FLASH dosimetry.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Electronics for Sensors II.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Highly Versatile X-ray and Electron Beam Diamond Dosimeter for Radiation Therapy and Protection.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes a compact electronic system employing a synchronous demodulation measurement method for the acquisition of pulsed-current signals. The fabricated prototype shows superior performance in terms of signal-to-noise ratio in comparison to conventional instrumentation performing free-running measurements, especially when extremely narrow pulses are concerned. It shows a reading error around 0.1% independently of the signal duty cycle (D) in the investigated D = 10−4−10−3 range. Conversely, high-precision electrometers display reading errors as high as 30% for a D = 10−4, which reduces to less than 1% only for D > 3 × 10−3. Field tests demonstrate that the developed front-end/readout electronics is particularly effective when coupled to dosimeters irradiated with the X-rays sourced by a medical linear accelerator. Therefore, it may surely be exploited for the real-time monitoring of the dosimeter output current, as required in modern radiotherapy techniques employing ultra-narrow pulses of high-energy photons or nuclear particles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.