Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35890927›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

An Ensemble Approach to Predict Early-Stage Diabetes Risk Using Machine Learning: An Empirical Study.

Umm E Laila, Khalid Mahboob, Abdul Wahid Khan, Faheem Khan, Whangbo Taekeun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
34.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Umm E LailaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 75300, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8050-5081
Khalid MahboobDepartment of Software Engineering, Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 75300, Pakistan.
Abdul Wahid KhanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Bannu 28100, Pakistan.
Faheem KhanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea.
Whangbo TaekeunDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea.
Gachon University · KRSir Syed University of Engineering and Technology · PKUniversity of Science and Technology Bannu · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a long-lasting disease triggered by expanded sugar levels in human blood and can affect various organs if left untreated. It contributes to heart disease, kidney issues, damaged nerves, damaged blood vessels, and blindness. Timely disease prediction can save precious lives and enable healthcare advisors to take care of the conditions. Most diabetic patients know little about the risk factors they face before diagnosis. Nowadays, hospitals deploy basic information systems, which generate vast amounts of data that cannot be converted into proper/useful information and cannot be used to support decision making for clinical purposes. There are different automated techniques available for the earlier prediction of disease. Ensemble learning is a data analysis technique that combines multiple techniques into a single optimal predictive system to evaluate bias and variation, and to improve predictions. Diabetes data, which included 17 variables, were gathered from the UCI repository of various datasets. The predictive models used in this study include AdaBoost, Bagging, and Random Forest, to compare the precision, recall, classification accuracy, and F1-score. Finally, the Random Forest Ensemble Method had the best accuracy (97%), whereas the AdaBoost and Bagging algorithms had lower accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMachine LearningAlgorithmsEmpirical ResearchHumansAdaBoostBaggingdata miningdiabetes datasetensemble techniquespredictionRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID35890927
PMCPMC9324493
OpenAlexW4285394323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.