ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Bridge Health Monitoring Using Strain Data and High-Fidelity Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Monitoring Application of an Adjustable Intelligent Bearing Based on Pressure Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- 5G-enabled, battery-less smart skins for self-monitoring megastructures and digital twin applications.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Case Studies about Finite Element Modeling and Wireless Sensing of Three Pennsylvania Bridges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Study on the Applicability of the Impact-Echo Test Using Semi-Supervised Learning Based on Dynamic Preconditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article presented a physics-based structural health monitoring (SHM) approach applied to a pretensioned adjacent concrete box beams bridge in order to predict the deformations associated with the presence of transient loads. A detailed finite element model was generated using ANSYS software to create an accurate model of the bridge. The presence of concentrated loads on the deck at different locations was simulated, and a static analysis was performed to quantify the deformations induced by the loads. Such deformations were then compared to the strains recorded by an array of wireless strain gauges during a controlled truckload test performed by an independent third party. The test consisted of twenty low-speed crossings at controlled distances from the bridge parapets using a truck with a certified load. The array was part of a SHM system that consisted of 30 wireless strain gauges. The results of the comparative analysis showed that the proposed physics-based monitoring is capable of identifying sensor-related faults and of determining the load distributions across the box beams. In addition, the data relative to near two-years monitoring were presented and showed the reliability of the SHM system as well as the challenges associated with environmental effects on the strain reading. An ongoing study is determining the ability of the proposed physics-based monitoring at estimating the variation of strain under simulated damage scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.