ArticlePolymers2022
Mechanical Strength of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattices Subjected to Three-Point Bending.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Overview of Additive Manufacturing of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Structures.Polymers · 2025Review
- Multi-Objective Geometry Optimization of Additive-Manufactured Hexagonal Honeycomb Sandwich Beams Under Quasi-Static Three-Point Bending Loading.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Numerical Simulation of Compressive Testing of Sandwich Structures with Novel Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Cores.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design of 3D printing osteotomy block for foot based on triply periodic minimal surface.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Design, Manufacturing, and Analysis of Periodic Three-Dimensional Cellular Materials for Energy Absorption Applications: A Critical Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mechanical Response of Carbon Composite Octet Truss Structures Produced via Axial Lattice Extrusion.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sandwich panel structures (SPSs) with lattice cores can considerably lower material consumption while simultaneously maintaining adequate mechanical properties. Compared with extruded lattice types, triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) lattices have light weight but better controllable mechanical properties. In this study, the different types of TPMS lattices inside an SPS were analysed comprehensively. Each SPS comprised two face sheets and a core filled with 20×5×1 TPMS lattices. The types of TPMS lattices considered included the Schwarz primitive (SP), Scherk's surface type 2 (S2), Schoen I-graph-wrapped package (I-WP), and Schoen face-centred cubic rhombic dodecahedron (F-RD). The finite element method was applied to determine the mechanical performance of different TPMS lattices at different relative densities inside the SPS under a three-point bending test, and the results were compared with the values calculated from analytical equations. The results showed a difference of less than 21% between the analytical and numerical results for the deformation. SP had the smallest deformation among the TPMS lattices, and F-RD can withstand the highest allowable load. Different failure modes were proposed to predict potential failure mechanisms. The results indicated that the mechanical performances of the TPMS lattices were mainly influenced by the lattice geometry and relative density.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.