Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35890605›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Recent Trends in Advanced Radiation Shielding Concrete for Construction of Facilities: Materials and Properties.

Muhd Afiq Hizami Abdullah, Raizal Saifulnaz Muhammad Rashid, Mugahed Amran, Farzad Hejazii, N M Azreen, Roman Fediuk, Yen Lei Voo, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, Mohd Idzat Idris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional BiNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhd Afiq Hizami AbdullahDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5626-7378
Raizal Saifulnaz Muhammad RashidDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-870X
Mugahed AmranDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4434-6295
Farzad HejaziiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
N M AzreenMaterial and Structural Integrity Group, Malaysia Nuclear Agency, Kajang 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Roman FediukPolytechnic Institute, Far Eastern Federal University, 690922 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-1240
Yen Lei VooDURA Technologies Sdn. Bhd, Jalan Chepor 11/8, Pusat Seramik Fasa 2, Ulu Chepor, Chemor 31200, Perak, Malaysia.
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004
Mohd Idzat IdrisSchool of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, National University of Malaysia, Selangor 43600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0531-7333

Funding

The research is partially funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the strategic academic leadership program 'Priority 2030'. Agreement 075-15-2021-1333 dated 30.09.2021.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear energy offers a wide range of applications, which include power generation, X-ray imaging, and non-destructive tests, in many economic sectors. However, such applications come with the risk of harmful radiation, thereby requiring shielding to prevent harmful effects on the surrounding environment and users. Concrete has long been used as part of structures in nuclear power plants, X-ray imaging rooms, and radioactive storage. The direction of recent research is headed toward concrete's ability in attenuating harmful energy radiated from nuclear sources through various alterations to its composition. Radiation shielding concrete (RSC) is a composite-based concrete that was developed in the last few years with heavy natural aggregates such as magnetite or barites. RSC is deemed a superior alternative to many types of traditional normal concrete in terms of shielding against the harmful radiation, and being economical and moldable. Given the merits of RSCs, this article presents a comprehensive review on the subject, considering the classifications, alternative materials, design additives, and type of heavy aggregates used. This literature review also provides critical reviews on RSC performance in terms of radiation shielding characteristics, mechanical strength, and durability. In addition, this work extensively reviews the trends of development research toward a broad understanding of the application possibilities of RSC as an advanced concrete product for producing a robust and green concrete composite for the construction of radiation shielding facilities as a better solution for protection from sources of radiation. Furthermore, this critical review provides a view of the progress made on RSCs and proposes avenues for future research on this hotspot research topic.

Indexed as

additivesgamma ray shieldingheavy aggregatesneutron shieldingradiation shielding concrete

Identifiers

PMID35890605
PMCPMC9316934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.