Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35890452›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comprehensive Comparison of Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of

Kye Man Cho, Hee Yul Lee, Du Yong Cho, Jea Gack Jung, Min Ju Kim, Jong Bin Jeong, Seong-Nam Jang, Ga Oun Lee, Han-Sol Sim, Min Ji Kang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficacy and Safety ofNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Ginsenoside-EnrichedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Increased Accumulation of Ginsenosides inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kye Man ChoDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Hee Yul LeeDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5015-9357
Du Yong ChoDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Jea Gack JungDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Min Ju KimDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Jong Bin JeongDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Seong-Nam JangDivision of Horticultural Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Ga Oun LeeDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Han-Sol SimDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Min Ji KangDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Ye Lin KimDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.
Ji Hyun LeeNational Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju-gun 55365, Korea.
Sooyeon LimNational Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju-gun 55365, Korea.
Ki-Ho SonDepartment of GreenBio Science, Agri-Food Bio Convergence Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52725, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5442-7400

Funding

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 821037031HD020Rural Development Administration PJ015655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the primary (such as amino acids, fatty acids, and minerals) and secondary (including ginsenosides, phenolic acids, and flavonols) metabolites and antioxidant effects of Panax ginseng sprouts (PGSs) by different cultivation systems, such as soil-substrate cultivation (SSC) and deep-water cultivation (DWC), in a plant factory has been observed. There was no significant difference in the total fatty acid (FA) contents. Particularly, the major FAs of PGSs were palmitic acid (207.4 mg/100 g) of saturated FAs and linoleic acid (397.6 mg/100 g) and α-linolenic acid (222.6 mg/100 g) of unsaturated FAs in the SSC system. The values of total amino acids were all higher in SSC than in DWC. In the case of ginsenosides, the total protopanaxtriol product was 30.88 mg/g in SSC, while the total protopanaxdiol product was 34.83 mg/g in DWC. In particular, the values of total phenolic acids and total flavonols were 133.36 and 388.19 ug/g, respectively, and SSC had a higher content than DWC. In conclusion, the SSC system was shown to be higher in nutritional constituents and antioxidant activities in soil cultivation, suggesting that PGS with SSC has a positive effect on the quality of PGS in a plant factory.

Indexed as

free amino acidginsengginsenosidemedicinal plantvertical farm

Identifiers

PMID35890452
PMCPMC9323035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.