Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35890260›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Intravitreal Application: Physicochemical Properties of Drugs Dissolved in Silicone Oils of Different Density in Comparison to the Porcine Vitreous Body.

Maximilian Hammer, Sonja K Schickhardt, Patrick R Merz, Ramin Khoramnia, Alexander F Scheuerle, Walter Mier, Philipp Uhl, Gerd U Auffarth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian HammerDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5496-2537
Sonja K SchickhardtDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick R MerzDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2971-0308
Ramin KhoramniaDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6237-7773
Alexander F ScheuerleDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Walter MierDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp UhlDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8616-5599
Gerd U AuffarthDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6927-5251
Augenklinik Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicone oil endotamponades provide a reservoir for drugs in the eye. Following vitrectomy surgery to treat retinal detachments, extensive diabetic retinopathy or endophthalmitis, they can be used as long-term lipophilic depots. This study aimed to investigate the physicochemical properties of intravitreally applied drugs of different lipophilicity, namely vancomycin, ceftazidime and voriconazole. For this purpose, an in vitro model of the silicone-oil-filled eye compared to porcine vitreous bodies (PVBs) was used. In a glass container, either light or heavy silicone oil or PVB was set into equilibrium with an aqueous fluid. Vancomycin, voriconazole and ceftazidime were added in concentrations commonly applied in clinical practice. The time course of the concentration of the drugs was determined in the hydrophilic phase for up to 24 h. With silicone oil present, the concentrations of vancomycin, voriconazole and ceftazidime were elevated in the aqueous humor when compared to the vitreous body (p < 0.001 for all drugs). With increasing lipophilicity, higher concentrations of the drug dissolved in silicone oil after 24 h (52.7%, 49.1% and 34.3% for vancomycin, ceftazidime and voriconazole, respectively). While no difference between lighter- and heavier-than-water silicone oil was apparent for vancomycin and ceftazidime (p = 0.17 and p = 0.72), voriconazole dissolved significantly better in the heavier-than-water silicone oil (p = 0.002). A higher-than-expected percentage of the glycopeptide vancomycin dissolved in the porcine vitreous body, possibly due to protein binding. In conclusion, silicone oils influence the drug concentration and distribution of intravitreally applied drugs depending on their lipophilicity. The addition of F6H8 used to create heavy silicone oils attenuates these effects for lipophilic drugs. Knowledge of the distribution of these intravitreally applied drugs is crucial to ensure the desired anti-infectious effect.

Indexed as

pharmacokineticssilicone oilvitreous body

Identifiers

PMID35890260
PMCPMC9319045
OpenAlexW4288205496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.