Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35889854›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Lifestyle Screening Tools for Children in the Community Setting: A Systematic Review.

Anne Krijger, Sovianne Ter Borg, Liset Elstgeest, Caroline van Rossum, Janneke Verkaik-Kloosterman, Elly Steenbergen, Hein Raat, Koen Joosten

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne KrijgerDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CB Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3770-7750
Sovianne Ter BorgNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8390-5080
Liset ElstgeestDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline van RossumNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-9894
Janneke Verkaik-KloostermanNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Elly SteenbergenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2811-6115
Hein RaatDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6000-7445
Koen JoostenDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CB Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening of children's lifestyle, including nutrition, may contribute to the prevention of lifestyle-related conditions in childhood and later in life. Screening tools can evaluate a wide variety of lifestyle factors, resulting in different (risk) scores and prospects of action. This systematic review aimed to summarise the design, psychometric properties and implementation of lifestyle screening tools for children in community settings. We searched the electronic databases of Embase, Medline (PubMed) and CINAHL to identify articles published between 2004 and July 2020 addressing lifestyle screening tools for children aged 0-18 years in the community setting. Independent screening and selection by two reviewers was followed by data extraction and the qualitative analysis of findings. We identified 41 unique lifestyle screening tools, with the majority addressing dietary and/or lifestyle behaviours and habits related to overweight and obesity. The domains mostly covered were nutrition, physical activity and sedentary behaviour/screen time. Tool validation was limited, and deliberate implementation features, such as the availability of clear prospects of actions following tool outcomes, were lacking. Despite the multitude of existing lifestyle screening tools for children in the community setting, there is a need for a validated easy-to-administer tool that enables risk classification and offers specific prospects of action to prevent children from adverse health outcomes.

Indexed as

OverweightSedentary BehaviorChildExerciseHumansLife StyleObesitylifestyle risknutritionobesityphysical activityscreenerssedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID35889854
PMCPMC9325265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.