Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35889823›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

How the "Are We Drinking Ourselves Sick?" Communication Campaign Built Support for Policy Action on Sugary Drinks in Jamaica.

Donnelle Christian, Meena Maharjan, Alexey Kotov, Trish Cotter, Sandra Mullin, Vonetta Nurse, Barbara McGaw, Deborah Chen, Pallavi Puri, Shuo Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donnelle ChristianPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.
Meena MaharjanPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-7226
Alexey KotovPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.
Trish CotterPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.
Sandra MullinPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.
Vonetta NurseGlobal Health Advocacy Project, The Heart Foundation of Jamaica, 28 Beechwood Avenue P.O. Box 338, Kingston 5, Jamaica.
Barbara McGawGlobal Health Advocacy Project, The Heart Foundation of Jamaica, 28 Beechwood Avenue P.O. Box 338, Kingston 5, Jamaica.
Deborah ChenGlobal Health Advocacy Project, The Heart Foundation of Jamaica, 28 Beechwood Avenue P.O. Box 338, Kingston 5, Jamaica.
Pallavi PuriPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.
Shuo WangPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.
Nalin Singh NegiPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.
Nandita MurukutlaPolicy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York, NY 10005, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5745-7664
Vital Strategies · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study assesses the effectiveness of a campaign “Are We Drinking Ourselves Sick?” that ran nationally in Jamaica in four phases from 2017 to 2019 to increase knowledge about the harms of sugary drinks, shift attitudes, and build support for policy actions to address sugary drink consumption, including a tax and a ban in schools. Methods: Campaign impact was measured in representative cross-sectional household surveys of adults ages 18 to 55. A baseline survey was conducted before the launch of the campaign (n = 1430). Evaluation surveys were conducted mid-campaign (n = 1571) and post-campaign (n = 1500). Campaign impact was assessed by comparing changes across survey periods on key knowledge, attitudinal and policy support outcome indicators. The independent association between campaign awareness and outcomes was analyzed using logistic regression analyses. Results: The campaign was recalled by more than 80% of respondents and was well-received with 90% or more respondents describing it as believable and relevant. There was a decline in knowledge on the harms of sugary drinks from the baseline to post-campaign period, notably on risks of diabetes (adjusted odds ratio or AOR = 0.62, p < 0.001), overweight and obesity (AOR = 0.58, p < 0.001), and heart disease (AOR = 0.79, p < 0.003). However, post-campaign awareness was independently associated in logistic regression analysis with improved knowledge of the harms of sugary drinks, including risks of diabetes (AOR = 1.45, p = 0.019), overweight or obesity (AOR = 1.65, p = 0.001), and heart disease (AOR = 1.44, p = 0.011). Support for government action remained high across survey waves (≥90%), and campaign awareness was independently associated with increased policy support for sugary drinks taxes (Mid-campaign: AOR = 1.43, p = 0.019; post-campaign: AOR = 1.46, p = 0.01) and restrictions on sugary drinks in schools (AOR = 1.55, p = 0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the role that media campaigns can play in maintaining knowledge and concern about the health harms of sugary drinks and increasing support for policy passage.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesSugar-Sweetened BeveragesAdolescentAdultBeveragesCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJamaicaMiddle AgedObesityOverweightPolicyYoung AdultJamaicamass media campaignsugary drinkstax

Identifiers

PMID35889823
PMCPMC9318558
OpenAlexW4285393152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.