Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35889372›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Effect of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Rich Pomegranate Peel Based Edible Coatings on Quality and Functional Properties of Chicken Nuggets.

Sadaf Bashir, Muhammad Sajid Arshad, Waseem Khalid, Gulzar Ahmad Nayik, Sami Al Obaid, Mohammad Javed Ansari, Andres Moreno, Ioannis K Karabagias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Development and Application of Edible Coatings withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Green Synthesis of Zn(OH)Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sadaf BashirDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sajid ArshadDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Waseem KhalidDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Gulzar Ahmad NayikDepartment of Food Science & Technology, Government Degree College, Shopian 192303, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8372-5936
Sami Al ObaidDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Javed AnsariDepartment of Botany, Hindu College Moradabad, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, Bareilly 244001, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8718-3078
Andres MorenoDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Sciences and Technologies, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-7506
Ioannis K KarabagiasDepartment of Food Science & Technology, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Patras, 30100 Agrinio, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3488-2684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study evaluated the effect of pomegranate peel-based edible coating on chicken nuggets in order to develop a functional and safe product, high in nutritional value. For this purpose, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and total phenolic content (TPC) assays were performed to check the potential antioxidant activity of chicken nuggets; microbial control, including total aerobic count and coliforms population, was performed for quality and safety purposes; and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and peroxide value (POV) were performed to determine the oxidative stability of chicken nuggets. Different treatments were applied at different storage periods (0th, 7th, 14th and 21st day). The higher value of total aerobic count (5.09 ± 0.05 log CFU/g) and coliforms (3.91 ± 0.06 log CFU/g) were obtained for the uncoated samples, while the lower population was enumerated in the combination of sodium alginate (SA) and pomegranate peel powder (PPP). However, DPPH (64.65 ± 2.15%) and TPC (135.66 ± 3.07 GAE/100 g) values were higher in the coated chicken nuggets (SA (1.5%) and PPP (1.5%)) and lowest in the control samples. The higher value of TBARS (1.62 ± 0.03 MDA/kg) and POV (0.92 ± 0.03 meq peroxide/kg) were observed in the uncoated chicken nuggets. In the Hunter color system, L*, a*, and b* peak values were determined in the coated chicken nuggets with SA (1.5%) + PPP (1.5%) at the 21st day of storage. The uncoated chicken nuggets had different sensory characteristics (appearance, color, taste, texture, and overall acceptability) compared to the coated samples. Conclusively, coating based on the combination of SA (1.5%) and PPP (1.5%) increased the quality, safety, and nutritional properties of chicken nuggets.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsEdible FilmsMeat ProductsPomegranateAnimalsAntioxidantsChickensPeroxidesThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesAnti-Infective AgentsAntioxidantsPeroxidesThiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substanceschicken meatcoatingnuggetspeelspomegranate

Identifiers

PMID35889372
PMCPMC9323308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.