Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35889228›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Application Potential of Bacterial Volatile Organic Compounds in the Control of Root-Knot Nematodes.

Ali Diyapoglu, Muhammet Oner, Menghsiao Meng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation and identification of metabolites produced byCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Volatile Organic Compounds ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. A Pilot Study forSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali DiyapogluGraduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4183-2885
Muhammet OnerDepartment of Life Science, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3814-6916
Menghsiao MengGraduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0179-432X

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan) MOST 110-2823-8-005-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) constitute the most damaging group of plant pathogens. Plant infections by root-knot nematodes (RKNs) alone could cause approximately 5% of global crop loss. Conventionally, chemical-based methods are used to control PPNs at the expense of the environment and human health. Accordingly, the development of eco-friendly and safer methods has been urged to supplement or replace chemical-based methods for the control of RKNs. Using microorganisms or their metabolites as biological control agents (BCAs) is a promising approach to controlling RKNs. Among the metabolites, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have gained increasing attention because of their potential in the control of not only RKNs but also other plant pathogens, such as insects, fungi, and bacteria. This review discusses the biology of RKNs as well as the status of various control strategies. The discovery of VOCs emitted by bacteria from various environmental sources and their application potential as BCAs in controlling RKNs are specifically addressed.

Indexed as

TylenchoideaVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsBacteriaHumansPlant DiseasesPlantsVolatile Organic Compoundsbiological control agents (BCAs)Meloidogyne spp.plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs)root-knot nematodes (RKNs)volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

PMID35889228
PMCPMC9318376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.