Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35889186›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Culturable Screening of Plant Growth-Promoting and Biocontrol Bacteria in the Rhizosphere and Phyllosphere of Wild Rice.

Zongmu Yao, Yalin Chen, Shouyang Luo, Jilin Wang, Jiafan Zhang, Jianfeng Zhang, Chunjie Tian, Lei Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Maize Endophytic Plant Growth-Promoting BacteriaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Simply Versatile: The Use ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zongmu YaoKey Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.
Yalin ChenKey Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.
Shouyang LuoKey Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.
Jilin WangRice Research Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Engineering Research Center for Rice, Nanchang 330200, China.
Jiafan ZhangKey Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.
Jianfeng ZhangKey Laboratory of Straw Biology and Utilization, The Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Chunjie TianKey Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1792-6005
Lei TianKey Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-8058
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNRice Research Institute · CN

Funding

Key Laboratory Foundation of Mollisols Agroecology 2020ZKHT-02Major Research and Development Projects of Jiangxi Province 20213AAF01001National Natural Science Foundation of China 42007043, 41920104008Science and Technology Cooperation Special Project of Jiangxi Province 20212BDH81023Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS XDA28020400, XDA28080200, XDA23070501, XDA26040202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild rice is an important improved resource for cultivated rice and its unique ability to resist biotic and abiotic stress has attracted the attention of many scholars. The microbial community structure in the rhizosphere and leaf area of different rice varieties is also different, which may be one of the reasons for the difference in stress resistance between wild rice and cultivated rice. Forty-six bacteria were screened from the rhizosphere and phyllospheric of four different wild rice varieties. The results of functions of the screened strains showed that 18 strains had a good inhibitory effect on rice blast, and 33 strains had the ability to dissolve phosphorus, potassium, or fix nitrogen. Through potted experiment, the three bacterial strains, 499G2 (

Indexed as

biocontrol bacteriagrowth-promoting bacteriarhizosphere microorganismswild rice

Identifiers

PMID35889186
PMCPMC9324538
OpenAlexW4286503268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.