ArticleMicroorganisms2022
The Use of Probiotic
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review: Shifts of rumen microbiota by feeding non-fibrous carbohydrates to improve cattle performance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Genome assembly of Megasphaera elsdenii CH4, a potential probiotic bacterium isolated from the rumen sample of Holstein dairy cow.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota derived from fecal microbiota transplantation enhances body weight of Mimas squabs.Animal bioscience · 2024Article
- A Novel Phytogenic Formulation, EUBIO-BPSG, as a Promising One Health Approach to Replace Antibiotics and Promote Reproduction Performance in Laying Hens.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reducing Salmonella in cattle may mitigate the risk of transmission through the food chain. Megasphaera elsdenii (ME) is a microorganism found naturally in the bovine rumen that can be administered as a probiotic to mitigate ruminal acidosis. Understanding the impact of feeding ME to Salmonella populations in cattle was the objective of this study. Bovine ruminal fluid (RF) and feces were inoculated with antibiotic susceptible or resistant Salmonella and treated with varying concentrations of ME. Salmonella was enumerated at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h using the most probable number (MPN). Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and pH were recorded from non-inoculated samples. Treating RF with ME did not significantly impact Salmonella concentration or VFA production (p > 0.05). The pH of RF and feces decreased over time (p ≤ 0.05). Salmonella concentration declined in feces, with the largest reduction of 1.92 log MPN/g and 1.05 log MPN/g observed for antibiotic susceptible Salmonella between 0 and 72 h by the 2.5 × 105 CFU/g and control (0.0 CFU/g) concentration of ME, respectively. Treating RF with ME did not impact Salmonella concentration. Salmonella concentration in feces decreased, although ME must be further investigated before a conclusion regarding efficacy in vitro can be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.