Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35889099›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Current Techniques to Study Beneficial Plant-Microbe Interactions.

Elisa Gamalero, Elisa Bona, Bernard R Glick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Whole genome analysis of Stenotrophomonas geniculata MK2 and antagonism against Botrytis cinerea in strawberry.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. AFrontiers in systems biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisa GamaleroDipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8273-9500
Elisa BonaDipartimento per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile e la Transizione Ecologica, 13100 Vercelli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4320-1203
Bernard R GlickDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1729-4258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many different experimental approaches have been applied to elaborate and study the beneficial interactions between soil bacteria and plants. Some of these methods focus on changes to the plant and others are directed towards assessing the physiology and biochemistry of the beneficial plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). Here, we provide an overview of some of the current techniques that have been employed to study the interaction of plants with PGPB. These techniques include the study of plant microbiomes; the use of DNA genome sequencing to understand the genes encoded by PGPB; the use of transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to study PGPB and plant gene expression; genome editing of PGPB; encapsulation of PGPB inoculants prior to their use to treat plants; imaging of plants and PGPB; PGPB nitrogenase assays; and the use of specialized growth chambers for growing and monitoring bacterially treated plants.

Indexed as

abiotic plant stressnitrogen fixationplant growth-promoting bacteriaplant-microbe interactionplant microbiomessoil bacteriasustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID35889099
PMCPMC9317800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.