Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35889098›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Mycelium vs. Fruiting Bodies of Edible Fungi-A Comparison of Metabolites.

Ralf G Berger, Sven Bordewick, Nina-Katharina Krahe, Franziska Ersoy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. High-Throughput Analysis Reveals Stable Metabolome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. ExploringJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ralf G BergerInstitute of Food Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0273-0766
Sven BordewickInstitute of Food Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8627-4007
Nina-Katharina KraheInstitute of Food Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6484-016X
Franziska ErsoyInstitute of Food Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-1825
Leibniz University Hannover · DE

Funding

Leibniz University Hannover Open Access Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edible mushrooms are widely appreciated for their appealing flavours, low caloric values and high content of presumably health-protecting metabolites. Their long history of safe use together with the looming worldwide food crisis have revived the idea of generating meat analogues and protein isolates by the controlled fermentation of mycelia of these edible fungi as a dietary option. The occurrence of proteins, polysaccharides, smaller metabolites, metal ions and toxins in mycelia and fruiting bodies is compared among the three most popular species,

Indexed as

Agaricus bisporusbasidiomycotachemical compositionedible fungifermentationfruiting bodiesLentinula edodesmycelium productionPleurotus ostreatus

Identifiers

PMID35889098
PMCPMC9315710
OpenAlexW4285009288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.