ArticleMetabolites2022
Convolutional Neural Network-Based Compound Fingerprint Prediction for Metabolite Annotation.
Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in functional food innovation: Bioactive enhancement and formulation optimization: A quasi-systematic review.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- Article
- Recent advances in data- and knowledge-driven approaches to explore primary microbial metabolism.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2023Review
- Deep Learning Based Metabolite Annotation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolite annotation has been a challenging issue especially in untargeted metabolomics studies by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This is in part due to the limitations of publicly available spectral libraries, which consist of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data acquired from just a fraction of known metabolites. Machine learning provides the opportunity to predict molecular fingerprints based on MS/MS data. The predicted molecular fingerprints can then be used to help rank putative metabolite IDs obtained by using either the precursor mass or the formula of the unknown metabolite. This method is particularly useful to help annotate metabolites whose corresponding MS/MS spectra are missing or cannot be matched with those in accessible spectral libraries. We investigated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for molecular fingerprint prediction based on data acquired by MS/MS. We used more than 680,000 MS/MS spectra obtained from the MoNA repository and NIST 20, representing about 36,000 compounds for training and testing our CNN model. The trained CNN model is implemented as a python package, MetFID. The package is available on GitHub for users to enter their MS/MS spectra and corresponding putative metabolite IDs to obtain ranked lists of metabolites. Better performance is achieved by MetFID in ranking putative metabolite IDs using the CASMI 2016 benchmark dataset compared to two other machine learning-based tools (CSI:FingerID and ChemDistiller).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.