ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022
Non-Destructive Removal of Dental Implant by Using the Cryogenic Method.
Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The gold standard for a successful prosthetic approach is the osseointegration of an implant. However, this integration can be a problem in cases where the implant needs to be removed. Removing the implant with minimal damage to the surrounding tissues is important. Osteocytes cannot survive below −2 °C, but epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and other surrounding tissue cells can. Remodeling can be triggered by cryotherapy at temperatures that specifically affect osteocyte necrosis. In this study, we aimed to develop a method for reversing the osseointegration mechanism and for protecting the surrounding tissues by bone remodeling induced by CO2 cryotherapy. Materials and Methods: In this study, eight 2.8 mm diameter, one-piece mini implants were used in New Zealand rabbit tibias. Two control and six implants were tested in this study. After 2 months of osseointegration, a reverse torque force method was used to remove all osseointegrated implants at 5, 10, 20, and 30 Ncm. The osseointegration of the implants was proven by periotest measurements. Changes in bone tissue were examined in histological sections stained with toluidine blue after rabbit sacrifice. The number of lacunae with osteocyte, empty lacunae, and lacunae greater than 5 µm and the osteon number in a 10,000 µm2 area were calculated. Cryotherapy was applied to the test implants for 1 min, 2 min, and 5 min. Three implants were subjected to cryotherapy at −40 °C, and the other implants were subjected to cryotherapy at −80 °C. Results: Empty lacunae, filled osteocytes, lacunae >5 µm, and the osteon count around the implant applied at −40 °C were not significantly different from the control implants. The application of −40 °C for 1 min was found to cause minimal damage to the bone cells. The implants, which were applied for 1 min and 2 min, were successfully explanted on the 2nd day with the 5 Ncm reverse torque method. Test implants, which were applied cold for 5 min, were explanted on day 1. Tissue damage was detected in all test groups at −80 °C. Conclusions: The method of removing implants with cryotherapy was found to be successful in −40 °C freeze−thaw cycles applied three times for 1 min. To prove implant removal with cryotherapy, more implant trials should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.