ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022
Practical Applicability of the ISARIC-4C Score on Severity and Mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Value of the CURB-65, MuLBSTA, Pneumonia Severity Index Scores and Laboratory Parameters for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and COVID-19 Infection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Semaglutide on Cardiometabolic Risk in People with Obesity, With and Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Severity Scores in SARS-CoV-2 Infection-A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review and Visualization Analysis.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Current Landscape of the Interrelationship Between Periodontitis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Assessing the Utility of Prediction Scores PAINT, ISARIC4C, CHIS, and COVID-GRAM at Admission and Seven Days after Symptom Onset for COVID-19 Mortality.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Predictive Factors for Altered Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Predictive Factors of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Negative Factors for the Clinical Outcome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with COVID-19 Combined with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Impact of Surge Strain and Pandemic Progression on Prognostication by an Established COVID-19-Specific Severity Score.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Utility of the 4C ISARIC mortality score in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at a large tertiary Saudi Arabian center.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives. There is a bidirectional relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and diabetes mellitus (DM), as people with DM are more vulnerable, and SARS-CoV-2 infections worsen the prognosis in these patients. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate the application validity of the ISARIC-4C score in patients confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Materials and Methods. The study included 159 patients previously known to have type 2 DM and confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We analyzed the concordance between the clinical evaluation of the patients and the ISARIC-4C score. Results. The mortality rate in hospitalized patients was 25.15%. The mortality risk was higher for ISARIC-4C values >14 than in the opposite group (63.93% vs. 31.24%; p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the mortality score was 0.875 (95% CI: 0.820−0.930; p < 0.001), correctly classifying 77.36% of the cohort. A cut-off value of >14 had a sensitivity of 87.80% (95% CI: 87.66−87.93), specificity 73.72% (95% CI: 73.48−73.96), positive predictive value 53.73% (95% CI: 53.41−54.04), and negative predictive value 94.56% (95% CI: 94.5−94.62). The Cox regression model showed that the length of hospitalization (LH) was significantly influenced by body mass index, lung impairment, and aspartate aminotransferase, increasing the hazards, while lower HbA1c and lower SatO2 significantly decreased the hazards. Conclusions. ISARIC-4C score estimates the likelihood of clinical deterioration and the mortality risk in patients hospitalized with type 2 DM and positive for SARS-CoV-2, being useful in assessing the prognosis from the onset, as well as in developing therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.