Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35888557›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Future Acceptability of Respiratory Virus Infection Control Interventions in General Population to Prevent Respiratory Infections.

Jaber S Alqahtani, Abdulelah M Aldhahir, Saad M AlRabeeah, Lujain B Alsenani, Haifa M Alsharif, Amani Y Alshehri, Mayadah M Alenazi, Musallam Alnasser, Ahmed S Alqahtani, Ibrahim A AlDraiwiesh and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Analysis of the Face Mask Use by Public Transport Passengers and Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaber S AlqahtaniDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-5092
Abdulelah M AldhahirRespiratory Therapy Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-9494
Saad M AlRabeeahDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Lujain B AlsenaniDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Haifa M AlsharifDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Amani Y AlshehriDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Mayadah M AlenaziDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Musallam AlnasserDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed S AlqahtaniDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim A AlDraiwieshDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed M AlghamdiClinical Technology Department, Respiratory Care Program, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21961, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6677-1110
Rayan A SirajRespiratory Therapy Department, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Hussain S AlqahtaniDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Jithin K SreedharanDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-7548
Abdullah S AlqahtaniDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6110-9200
Eidan M AlzahraniPhysical Therapy Department, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam 34313, Saudi Arabia.
Prince Sultan University · SAJazan University · SAKing Faisal University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In both pandemic and non-pandemic situations, nonpharmaceutical public health measures may offer easy, low-cost, and effective means of reducing the spread and impact of acute respiratory infections. It is unknown whether such measures would be acceptable to the Saudi community beyond the current pandemic. Materials and Methods: A validated survey was used to test community acceptance of the measures. Respondents were asked which infection control practices they planned to maintain and which they believed should be policies for the community as a whole after the COVID-19 pandemic has subsided. Results: The survey was completed by 2057 people (95% completion rate), 1486 (72%) of whom were female, 259 (12.5%) of whom were current smokers, and 72 (3.5%) of whom had chronic lung disease. The most prevalent age groups were 18−30 years (933; 45.4%) and 31−40 years (483; 23.5%), with 641 individuals over 40 years old. Of the responses, 93% indicated that they would continue washing their hands more often; 92% wanted both clinicians and patients to wear masks in hospitals; 86% would continue avoiding smoking in indoor and outdoor areas; 73% would continue wearing a face covering on public transportation; 70% indicated that they would continue wearing a face covering in indoor public places. Regarding the respiratory virus infection control measures, 85% (11/13) received significant support (≥70% acceptability level) for continuation as policies in the future. Wearing face coverings outdoors and social distancing outdoors received little support (45% and 66%, respectively). Of the respiratory virus infection control measures, 54% received less support from current smokers than non-smokers (acceptability level < 70%). People with chronic respiratory disease supported 77% of the measures being regarded as policies in the future. Conclusion: The Saudi community supports nonpharmacological respiratory infection control measures that reduce the likelihood of infection. Public health campaigns should target smokers to increase awareness of the importance of these measures in lowering infections. Based on the findings of this study, nonpharmacological treatments should be presented and included in future recommendations for both the public and patients diagnosed with chronic respiratory diseases.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Tract InfectionsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfection ControlMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVIDpublic healthrespiratory infectionssmokingsocial distance

Identifiers

PMID35888557
PMCPMC9318605
OpenAlexW4283328489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.