ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Optimal Dimensioning of Retaining Walls Using Explainable Ensemble Learning Algorithms.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Investigate the Contribution of Design Variables to the Static Characteristics of Bistable Composite Laminates.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Optimization and Predictive Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Circular Columns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper develops predictive models for optimal dimensions that minimize the construction cost associated with reinforced concrete retaining walls. Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Categorical Gradient Boosting (CatBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithms were applied to obtain the predictive models. Predictive models were trained using a comprehensive dataset, which was generated using the Harmony Search (HS) algorithm. Each data sample in this database consists of a unique combination of the soil density, friction angle, ultimate bearing pressure, surcharge, the unit cost of concrete, and six different dimensions that describe an optimal retaining wall geometry. The influence of these design features on the optimal dimensioning and their interdependence are explained and visualized using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm. The prediction accuracy of the used ensemble learning methods is evaluated with different metrics of accuracy such as the coefficient of determination, root mean square error, and mean absolute error. Comparing predicted and actual optimal dimensions on a test set showed that an R2 score of 0.99 could be achieved. In terms of computational speed, the LightGBM algorithm was found to be the fastest, with an average execution speed of 6.17 s for the training and testing of the model. On the other hand, the highest accuracy could be achieved by the CatBoost algorithm. The availability of open-source machine learning algorithms and high-quality datasets makes it possible for designers to supplement traditional design procedures with newly developed machine learning techniques. The novel methodology proposed in this paper aims at producing larger datasets, thereby increasing the applicability and accuracy of machine learning algorithms in relation to optimal dimensioning of structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.