ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of intracanal moisture on dentinal tubule infiltration of a calcium silicate-containing resin-based sealer assessed with confocal laser scanning microscopy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of heat impacts on bond strength and failure modes of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based sealers.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of root canal obturation techniques and sealers in Diabetic Dentin: An in-vitro push-out bond strength test.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioRoot RCS with Various Gutta-percha cones using spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy: anFrontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Periapical Lesion Healing After Retreatment and Root Canal Filling with a Bioceramic-Based Sealer: A Randomized Clinical Study with 1-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Resistance of gutta-percha and calcium silicate-based sealer to dislocation after non-surgical root canal retreatment.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of pushout bond strength of three different sealers: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Physicochemical properties, bond strength, and antibiofilm activity of a powder-gel bioceramic endodontic sealer.Brazilian dental journal · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance of Endodontic Sealer Types and Filling Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative Assessment of Push-Out Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Different Calcium-Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Bond Strength, and Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers: AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Interfacial Adaptation and Depth Penetration of Recent HiFlow versus Regular Bioceramic Sealers in Conjunction with BC Gutta-Percha Points Using Two Different Obturation Techniques-A Preliminary Report of an Ex Vivo Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- An automated method to analyze root filling voids and gaps using confocal microscopy images.Odontology · 2024Article
- Influence of bioceramic cones on the quality of root canal filling relative to bond strength and adaptation of the adhesive interface.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into four groups using the following endodontic sealers: RealSeal SE and Resilon (RSSE); EndoSequence BC sealer and BC Point (EBCS); Endoseal MTA and gutta-percha (EDS); Bioroot RCS and gutta-percha (BRS). Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin, and the roots were sectioned horizontally into 1 mm slices. For each slice, the perimeter was measured. A push-out test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. For each sample, bond strength was calculated. Specimens were examined by SEM investigation in order to analyze the dentin−sealer−core interface. Results were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey and Bonferroni test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that EDS and gutta-percha had significantly higher resistance to dislodgement compared to the other three groups (p < 0.05). EBCS and BC Point showed significantly greater push-out bond strength values compared to RSSE and Resilon (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bioceramic endodontic sealers showed a higher bond strength to root dentin than methacrylate resin-based endodontic sealer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.