ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Predictive Modeling of Compressive Strength for Concrete at Super Early Age.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven optimization of alkali-activated sustainable pavement concrete incorporating agro-industrial wastes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete at Super-Early Age.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Basalt Fiber Reinforced High-Performance Concrete Using Machine Learning Techniques.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The compressive strength of concrete is an important parameter in construction practice. At present, there are few reports on the prediction model of the compressive strength of concrete at a super early age. For some engineering vibration analyses, it is very necessary to study the growth law of compressive strength of concrete at a super early age. To this end, a new prediction model is proposed in this work to analyze the variation of compressive strength for the concrete at a super early age. The innovations of this work mainly lie in two aspects. The first innovation is to propose a new compressive strength-age mathematical model to predict the variation of compressive strength more accurately. The second innovation is to develop a new robust regression analysis method to obtain the fitting parameters in the mathematical model more effectively. Using the experimental data of the super early age concrete, the proposed prediction model is compared with the existing power function model and the hyperbolic function model. The results of the comparative study show that the prediction model proposed in this work is more reasonable and reliable. Taking C40 under natural curing as an example, it has been shown from the comparative study that: (1) The total fitting error of the proposed model is approximately 60% of that of the power function model, and approximately 17% of that of the hyperbolic model; (2) The fitting standard deviation of the proposed model is approximately 49% of that of the power function model, and approximately 15% of that of the hyperbolic model; (3) The 28 day strength of concrete predicted by the proposed model is more in line with the actual strength growth law of concrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.