Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35888101›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Effect of Dietary

Ahmed F Fath El-Bab, Sultan A M Saghir, Ibrahim Atta Abu El-Naser, Salwa M M Abo El-Kheir, Marwa F Abdel-Kader, Reem S Alruhaimi, Haifa A Alqhtani, Ayman M Mahmoud, Mohammed A E Naiel, Ali Ali El-Raghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Co-Supplementation of Diet withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Aquaculture nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Live Yeast (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Potential benefits of yeastFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ahmed F Fath El-BabDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta 34517, Egypt.
Sultan A M SaghirDepartment of Medical Analysis, Princess Aisha Bint Al-Hussein College of Nursing and Medical Sciences, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma'an 71111, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-3199
Ibrahim Atta Abu El-NaserDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta 34517, Egypt.
Salwa M M Abo El-KheirDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta 34517, Egypt.
Marwa F Abdel-KaderCentral Laboratory for Aquaculture Research, Sakha Aquaculture Research Unit, Department of Fish Diseases and Management, A.R.C., Giza 12411, Egypt.
Reem S AlruhaimiDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Haifa A AlqhtaniDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Ayman M MahmoudPhysiology Division, Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-6500
Mohammed A E NaielDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8172-5366
Ali Ali El-RaghiDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta 34517, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-1816-8701
Damietta University · EGPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAAl-Hussein Bin Talal University · JOBeni-Suef University · EGCentral Laboratory for Agricultural Climate · EGZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the beneficial effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) on growth, intestinal morphometric characteristics, blood indices, redox balance, expression of immune-related genes, and their involvement in disease resistance in sea bream (Sparus aurata). Three hundred healthy sea bream fingerlings were allocated into equal four groups (15 fish per hapa). The first group was served as a control and received a basal diet, while the other three groups were fed diets containing 1, 2, and 4 g/kg diet SC, respectively. At the end of week 16, the daily weight gain, specific growth rate, and feed utilization were significantly higher in the SC2 and SC4 groups than the control (p < 0.05). SC dose-dependently improved intestinal morphology, and the 4 g/kg diet significantly increased dry matter, crude fat, and crude protein percentage of body composition when compared with the control group. The 4 g/kg SC boosted innate immune response and phagocytic activity, and all SC-supplemented diets improved total protein, glucose, triglycerides, and urea concentrations, as well as intestinal digestive enzymatic activities. All estimated oxidative markers were significantly enhanced in the group that received 4 g/kg SC when compared with the control and other SC groups (p < 0.05). Feeding the fish a diet supplemented with 4 g/kg SC markedly regulated the expression of HSP70, IGF1, and IL-1β genes. In addition, the 4 g/kg SC-supplemented diet was the most effective in protecting the fish against Vibrio parahaemolyticus challenge. In conclusion, SC-enriched diet improved growth performance, intestinal morphology, redox homeostasis, and immune response of S. aurata with the 4 g/kg concentration as the most effective.

Indexed as

growthimmunitySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSparus aurataVibrio parahaemolyticus

Identifiers

PMID35888101
PMCPMC9325271
OpenAlexW4284973529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.