Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35887994›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care.

Armin Niklas Flinspach, Jürgen Konczalla, Volker Seifert, Kai Zacharowski, Eva Herrmann, Ümniye Balaban, Elisabeth Hannah Adam

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05246969 (Detecting Sepsis in Patients With Severe Subarachnoideal Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05246969 completednot on this map

Detecting Sepsis in Patients With Severe Subarachnoideal Hemorrhage

TypeobservationalSponsorGoethe UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled58ConditionsSubarachnoid Hemorrhage, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Sepsis Syndrome, SepsisArmsSepsis detection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Armin Niklas FlinspachDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2886-8947
Jürgen KonczallaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9771-7806
Volker SeifertDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
Kai ZacharowskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0212-9110
Eva HerrmannDepartment of Biostatistic and Mathematic Modeling, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Ümniye BalabanDepartment of Biostatistic and Mathematic Modeling, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Elisabeth Hannah AdamDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5008-6293
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis and septic shock continue to have a very high mortality rate. Therefore, the last consensus-based sepsis guideline introduced the sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to ensure a rapid diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. In neurosurgical patients, especially those patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), there are considerable difficulties in interpreting the SOFA score. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the applicability of the SOFA for critical care patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods: Our retrospective monocentric study was registered (NCT05246969) and approved by the local ethics committee (# 211/18). Patients admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery at the Frankfurt University Hospital were enrolled during the study period. Results: We included 57 patients with 85 sepsis episodes of which 141 patients had SOFA score-positive results and 243 SIRS positive detections. We failed to detect a correlation between the clinical diagnosis of sepsis and positive SOFA or SIRS scores. Moreover, a significant proportion of sepsis that was incorrectly detected via the SOFA score could be attributed to cerebral vasospasms (p < 0.01) or a decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale (p < 0.01). Similarly, a positive SIRS score was often not attributed to a septic episode (49.0%). Discussion: Regardless of the fact that SAH is a rare disease, the relevance of sepsis detection should be given special attention in light of the long duration of therapy and sepsis prevalence. Among the six modules represented by the SOFA score, two highly modules were practically eliminated. However, to enable early diagnosis of sepsis, the investigator’s clinical views and synopsis of various scores and laboratory parameters should be highlighted. Conclusions: In special patient populations, such as in critically ill SAH patients, the SOFA score can be limited regarding its applicability. In particular, it is very important to differentiate between CVS and sepsis.

Indexed as

cerebral vasospasminfectionneurosurgerypneumoniasepsissequential organ failure assessment scoressubarachnoid hemorrhagesystemic inflammatory response syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35887994
PMCPMC9319068
OpenAlexW4286492126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.