ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
New Therapeutic Maneuver for Horizontal Semicircular Canal Cupulolithiasis: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuropsychophysiological Effects of a Single Functional Neurology Intervention on Semicircular Canals Stimuli Dysfunction.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo a systematic review of the effects of comorbidities.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and asymmetric hearing loss: is the worst hearing ear likely to suffer from otoconial displacement?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Vestibular Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are debates on whether mastoid oscillation has any benefit or harm in treating horizontal semicircular canal (HSCC) cupulolithiasis. The goal of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of the new maneuver using only inertia and gravity and compare it with the previously reported cupulolith repositioning maneuver using mastoid vibration (CuRM).
methodsWe enrolled 57 patients diagnosed with HSCC cupulolithiasis. Patients were randomly allocated to the previously reported CuRM or the new maneuver (briefly, 30° head rotation to the affected side and thereafter bidirectional side-lying) using simply inertia and gravity, and their immediate and short-term effects were evaluated.
resultsThe immediate success rate did not differ significantly between the CuRM (8 of 22, 36.4%) and the new maneuver (10 of 35, 28.6%) groups (
conclusionsThis study showed that the new maneuver was effective for treating HSCC cupulolithiasis with an immediate success rate of 28.6% (10 of 35). Although it did not show better results than the existing maneuver using vibration, there was no statistical difference. Considering the debate on the effectiveness of oscillation, we believe our new maneuver is a conservative alternative that uses only inertia and gravity, and it can be easily performed in clinics where oscillation equipment is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.