Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35887882›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

RWT/SaVR-A Simple and Highly Accurate Measure Screening for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Elsa Arnberg, Per Eldhagen, Viktor Löfbacka, Ashwin Venkateshvaran, Björn Pilebro, Per Lindqvist

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Echocardiographic red flags of ATTR cardiomyopathy a single centre validation.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024
    Article
  6. Assessing left atrial dysfunction in cardiac amyloidosis using LA-LV strain slope.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elsa ArnbergDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, SE-901 85 Umea, Sweden.
Per EldhagenCardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Viktor LöfbackaDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, SE-901 85 Umea, Sweden.
Ashwin VenkateshvaranCardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0676-0604
Björn PilebroDepartment of Cardiology, Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, SE-901 85 Umea, Sweden.
Per LindqvistDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, SE-901 85 Umea, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-9166
Umeå University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation 20200160Swedish Research Council 2019-01338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis is an underdiagnosed condition and simple methods for accurate diagnosis are warranted. We aimed to validate a novel, dual-modality approach to identify transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA), employing echocardiographic relative wall thickness (RWT), and ECG S-wave from aVR (SaVR), and compare its accuracy with conventional echocardiographic approaches. Material and methods: We investigated 102 patients with ATTR-CA and 65 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), all with septal thickness > 14 mm. We validated the accuracy of echocardiographic measures, including RWT, RWT/SaVR, posterior wall thickness (PWT), LV mass index (LVMI), left atrial volume index (LAVI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and relative apical sparing (RELAPS) to identify ATTR-CA diagnosed using DPD-scintigraphy or abdominal fat biopsy. Results: PWT, RWT, RELAPS, troponin, and RWT/SaVR were significantly higher in ATTR-CA compared to LVH. RWT/SaVR > 0.7 was the most accurate parameter to identify ATTR-CA (sensitivity 97%, specificity 90% and accuracy 91%). RELAPS was found to have much less accuracy (sensitivity 74%, specificity 76% and accuracy 73%). Conclusion: We can confirm the very strong diagnostic accuracy of RWT/SaVR to identify ATTR-CA in patients with septal thickness > 14 mm. Given its high sensitivity and specificity, RWT/SaVR > 0.7 has the potential to implement as a non-invasive, simple, and widely available diagnostic tool when screening for ATTR-CA.

Indexed as

cardiac amyloidosisECGleft ventricular hypertrophyrelative wall thicknesstransthyretin

Identifiers

PMID35887882
PMCPMC9320450
OpenAlexW4285733515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.