ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Quantitative Bone Marrow Imaging in Non-Hematooncological Subjects: Associations with Age, Gender and Other Variables.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for the Detection of Bone Edema-Like Lesions in the Equine Foot: Standing Horses and Cadaveric Specimens.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Sphenoid sinus hyperpneumatization: anatomical variants, molecular blueprints, and AI-augmented roadmaps for skull base surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using enhanced images based on dual-energy computed tomography material decomposition: a comparison with quantitative computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our aim is to assess the utility and associations of quantitative bone marrow attenuation (BMA) values measured on clinical dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) exams in non-hematooncologic subjects with skeletal regions, patient age, gender, and other clinical variables. Methods: Our local ethics committee approved this retrospective image data analysis. Between July 2019 and July 2021, 332 eligible patients (mean age, 64 ± 18 years; female, 135) were identified. Inclusion criteria were the availability of a standardized abdominopelvic DECT data set acquired on the same scanner with identical protocol. Eleven regions-of-interest were placed in the T11-L5 vertebral bodies, dorsal iliac crests, and femur necks. Patient age, gender, weight, clinical, habitual variables, inflammation markers, and anemia were documented in all cases. Results: Multi-regression analyses (all, p < 0.05) identified age as the strongest predictor of lumbar BMA (standardized coefficient: β = −0.74), followed by CRP (β = 0.11), LDH (β = 0.11), and gender (β = −0.10). In the lower thoracic spine, age was the strongest predictor (β = −0.58) of BMA, followed by gender (β = −0.09) and LDH (β = 0.12). In femoral bones, age was negatively predictive of BMA (β = −0.12), whereas LDH and anemia were positively predictive (β = 0.16 both). Heart insufficiency significantly decreased (β = 0.12, p = 0.034) a BMA value gradient from higher to lower HU values along the vertebrae T11 and L5, whereas age significantly increased this gradient (β = −0.2, p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: DECT-based BMA measurements can be obtained from clinical CT exams. BMA values are negatively associated with patient age and influenced by gender, anemia, and inflammatory markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.