Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35887708›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Quality of Life and Psychological Distress among Patients with Small Renal Masses.

Liliana Vartolomei, Andrei Cotruș, Camelia Stanciu, Cristian Delcea, Marco Tozzi, Elena Lievore, Felice Crocetto, Francesco Del Giudice, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Matteo Muto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimal assessment of quality of life for patients with prostate cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Liliana VartolomeiI.O.S.U.D., George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology from Târgu Mureș, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4102-3877
Andrei CotrușDepartment of Psychology, Dimitrie Cantemir University, 540545 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Camelia StanciuDepartment of Psychology, Dimitrie Cantemir University, 540545 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Cristian DelceaDepartment of Psychology, Tibiscus University, 300559 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-2898
Marco TozziDepartment of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Elena LievoreDepartment of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Felice CrocettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Human Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-7660
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-5988
Giuseppe LucarelliAndrology & Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency & Organ Transplantation-Urology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-1229
Matteo MutoDepartment of Onco-Hematological Diseases, U.O.C. Radiotherapy-Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati-(AV), 83100 Avellino, Italy.
Matteo FerroDepartment of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9250-7858
European Institute of Oncology · ITDimitrie Cantemir University · ROAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITTibiscus University of Timișoara · ROUniversitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș · ROUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL) and psychological distress represent an important aspect of the daily life of cancer patients. The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze available literature regarding QoL and psychological distress in patients with small renal masses (SRMs). (2) Methods: A systematic search of EMBASE, PUBMED and American Psychological Association (APA-net) was performed on 30 April 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they included patients with SRMs, had a prospective or retrospective design, included at least 10 patients, were published in the last 20 years, and assessed the QoL or psychological distress in patients that underwent active surveillance (AS) in comparison to those that underwent ablation/surgery treatments. (3) Results: The patients that underwent AS were statistically significantly older, with smaller renal masses than those that underwent surgery/ablation. A study showed a significant reduction in total scores of Short Form-12 (SF-12) among AS patients when compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) patients at enrollment (95.0 ± 15.8 vs. 99.1 ± 13.9), 2 years (91.0 ± 16.4 vs. 100.3 ± 14.3), and at 3 years (92.9 ± 15.9 vs. 100.3 ± 14.3), p < 0.05, respectively. That was mainly due to lower physical health scores. On the other hand, another study showed that AS patients with a biopsy-proven malignant tumor had a worse psychological distress sub-score (PDSS) compared to patients treated with surgery/ablation after biopsy. (4) Conclusions: It seems that there is an influence on QoL and psychological distress while on AS of SMRs. However, due to the low amount of available data, the impact of AS or active treatment on QoL or psychological distress of patients with small renal masses warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

active surveillancenephrectomyquality of liferenal cancersmall renal masses

Identifiers

PMID35887708
PMCPMC9324284
OpenAlexW4284885767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.