ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of fetal growth monitoring strategies for the prediction of small for gestational age at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- TRIP10 as a Key Regulator in Fetal Growth Restriction: a Study Integrating Bioinformatics Screening with Experimental Validation.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
- A multiparameter model combining ultrasound and maternal serum biomarkers accurately predicts late-onset fetal growth restriction.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of the prediction of fetal growth restriction using the ratio of fetal cerebellar transverse diameter to abdominal circumference combined with uterine artery blood flow parameters.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Early identification of fetal growth restriction using ultrasound biometrics and biochemical markers: a comprehensive diagnostic approach.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Associations of fetal and postnatal growth trajectories with child cognition: the GUSTO cohort study.International journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify growth-restricted fetuses using biometric parameters and to assess the validity and clinical value of individual ultrasound parameters and ratios, such as transcerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference (TCD/AC), head circumference/abdominal circumference (HC/AC), and femur length/abdominal circumference (FL/AC). In a retrospective single-center cross-sectional study, the biometric data of 9292 pregnancies between the 15th and 42nd weeks of gestation were acquired. Statistical analysis included descriptive data, quantile regression estimating the 10th and 90th percentiles, and multivariable analysis. We obtained clinically noticeable results in predicting small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) fetuses at advanced weeks of gestation using the AC with a Youden index of 0.81 and 0.96, respectively. The other individual parameters and quotients were less suited to identifying cases of SGA and FGR. The multivariable analysis demonstrated the best results for identifying SGA and FGR fetuses with an area under the curve of 0.95 and 0.96, respectively. The individual ultrasound parameters were better suited to identifying SGA and FGR than the ratios. Amongst these, the AC was the most promising individual parameter, especially at advanced weeks of gestation. However, the highest accuracy was achieved with a multivariable model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.