ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Quantifying Spatial Heterogeneity of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes to Predict Survival of Individual Cancer Patients.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative prediction of cervical cancer recurrence using explainable MRI radiomics: a SHAP-Guided machine learning study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Transcriptome profiling of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity against patient-derived lung cancer organoids.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Inferring spatial transcriptomics markers from whole slide images to characterize metastasis-related spatial heterogeneity of colorectal tumors: A pilot study.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), identified on HE-stained histopathological images in the cancer area, are indicators of the adaptive immune response against cancers and play a major role in personalized cancer immunotherapy. Recent works indicate that the spatial organization of TILs may be prognostic of disease-specific survival and recurrence. However, there are a limited number of methods that were proposed and tested in analyses of the spatial structure of TILs. In this work, we evaluated 14 different spatial measures, including the one developed for other omics data, on 10,532 TIL maps from 23 cancer types in terms of reproducibility, uniqueness, and impact on patient survival. For each spatial measure, 16 different scenarios for the definition of prognostic factor were tested. We found no difference in survival prediction when TIL maps were stored as binary images or continuous TIL probability scores. When spatial measures were discretized into a low and high category, a higher correlation with survival was observed. Three measures with the highest cancer prognosis capability were spatial autocorrelation, GLCM M1, and closeness centrality. Most of the tested measures could be further tuned to increase prediction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.