Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35887538›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Individualized Wound Closure-Mechanical Properties of Suture Materials.

Elias Polykandriotis, Jonas Daenicke, Anil Bolat, Jasmin Grüner, Dirk W Schubert, Raymund E Horch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elias PolykandriotisDepartment of Plastic, Hand and Microsurgery, Sana Hospital Hof, 95032 Hof, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8152-6420
Jonas DaenickeDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Anil BolatDepartment of Orthopedics, Theresien Hospital, 90491 Nürnberg, Germany.
Jasmin GrünerDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Erlangen Medical Center, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Dirk W SchubertDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Raymund E HorchDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Erlangen Medical Center, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-2353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound closure is a key element of any procedure, especially aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. Therefore, over the last decades, several devices have been developed in order to assist surgeons in achieving better results while saving valuable time. In this work, we give a concise review of the literature and present a biomechanical study of different suturing materials under mechanical load mimicking handling in the operating theatre. Nine different suture products, all of the same USP size (4-0), were subjected to a standardized crushing load by means of a needle holder. All materials were subjected to 0, 1, 3 and 5 crushing load cycles, respectively. The linear tensile strength was measured by means of a universal testing device. Attenuation of tensile strength was evaluated between materials and between crush cycles. In the pooled analysis, the linear tensile strength of the suture materials deteriorated significantly with every cycle (p < 0.0001). The suture materials displayed different initial tensile strengths (in descending order: polyglecaprone, polyglactin, polydioxanone, polyamid, polypropylene). In comparison, materials performed variably in terms of resistance to crush loading. The findings were statistically significant. The reconstructive surgeon has to be flexible and tailor wound closure techniques and materials to the individual patient, procedure and tissue demands; therefore, profound knowledge of the physical properties of the suture strands used is of paramount importance. The crushing load on suture materials during surgery can be detrimental for initial and long-term wound repair strength. As well as the standard wound closure methods (sutures, staples and adhesive strips), there are promising novel devices.

Indexed as

crush loadmechanical propertiessuture materialswound closure

Identifiers

PMID35887538
PMCPMC9316899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.