Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35887526›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

"

Giulia Atzori, Marco Gipponi, Chiara Cornacchia, Raquel Diaz, Marco Sparavigna, Maurizio Gallo, Tommaso Ruelle, Federica Murelli, Simonetta Franchelli, Francesca Depaoli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia AtzoriBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Marco GipponiBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Chiara CornacchiaBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Raquel DiazDepartment Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Marco SparavignaBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9925-2851
Maurizio GalloDepartment of Internal Medicine (Di.M.I.), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Tommaso RuelleDepartment Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Federica MurelliBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Simonetta FranchelliBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Francesca DepaoliBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Daniele FriedmanBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Piero FregattiBreast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adapted BCS-NAC; margin involvement was always assessed at definitive histology. Patients with complete pathological response (pCR) were classified as the RX group, whereas those with residual disease and negative margins were stratified as R0 < 1 mm (margin < 1 mm) and R0 > 1 mm (margin > 1 mm). Results: Totals of 29 (19.2%), 64 (42.4%), and 58 patients (38.4%) were included in the R0 < 1 mm, R0 > 1 mm, and RX groups, respectively, and 2 patients with margin involvement had a mastectomy. Ten instances of local recurrence (6.6%) occurred, with no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the three groups. A statistically significant advantage of disease-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.010) was observed in patients with pCR. Conclusions: BCS-NAC was increased, especially in HER-2-positive and triple-negative tumors; risk-adapted BCS should be preferably pursued to highlight the cosmetic benefit of NAC. The similar rate of LRFS in the three groups of patients suggests a shift toward the “no ink on tumor” paradigm for patients undergoing BCS-NAC.

Indexed as

breast cancer surgeryexcisionneoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35887526
PMCPMC9320436
OpenAlexW4283369962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.